Mentoring for Success: What Most Workplace Mentoring Gets Wrong (and how to fix it)

Home / News, Views & Updates / Mentoring for Success: What Most Workplace Mentoring Gets Wrong (and how to fix it)

Mentoring for Success: What Most Workplace Mentoring Gets Wrong (and how to fix it)

By Gina Ryan

Mentoring has a funny reputation in workplaces. Everyone agrees it matters, but many mentoring relationships quietly drift. Meetings become irregular. The mentor feels pressure to have all the answers. The mentee stays polite, but progress slows.

In my experience, this rarely happens because people do not care. It happens because mentoring is often treated as informal, intuitive and self-explanatory. And that is exactly where things start to go wrong.

I have been seeing the need for stronger mentoring capability rising over the last few years, especially in organisations where senior people are viewed as the “gatekeepers of knowledge” and a new cohort is coming in with strong theory but still learning how to apply it in real roles. What these organisations often need is not more goodwill. They need structure, clarity, and practical mentoring skills that can be used immediately.

This article is for two audiences:

  • Professionals who have been asked to mentor and want to do it well
  • HR and L&D teams who are building mentoring capability across an organisation.

My goal is that you learn something useful, shift how you think about mentoring and leave with practical next steps you can apply straight away.

Why mentoring feels harder now

Effective mentoring plays a central role in supporting workplace learning, developing professional capability and strengthening organisational culture. As organisations navigate increasingly complex roles and responsibilities, the need for skilled mentors who can provide structured, experience-based support has never been greater.

One of the biggest changes I see is the gap between technical excellence and the ability to guide others in applying knowledge effectively. Many people with deep expertise, whether technical specialists, senior professionals, or long-tenured employees are asked to mentor without clear expectations, structure, or tools. That is the problem this programme is designed to solve.

Mentoring

Myth 1: “If you can coach, train, or manage, you can mentor”

This is one of the most common misunderstandings I come across. Mentoring overlaps with coaching and management, but it is not the same thing.

“Sure, if you know how to train, you know how to mentor. Sure, if you know how to coach, you know how to mentor. Mentoring is a different relationship.” If the mentor, the organisation, or the mentee does not understand that difference, the relationship becomes unclear, boundaries get blurred and trust can weaken.

A simple reset helps: mentoring is a distinct relationship with a different purpose. It is not coaching, training, or managing. When you confuse these roles, it becomes very hard to create a mentoring relationship that feels safe, neutral and genuinely developmental.

Myth 2: “A mentor should be the person’s manager”

Best practice is clear: you should not mentor somebody you manage. It is a different relationship.

I often describe mentoring as needing to be a “clean relationship” because mentoring is meant to support career development and wisdom sharing without the agenda that comes with line management.

When a mentor is also the manager, the mentee may hold back. They already have one-to-ones, coaching sessions and appraisal meetings with that manager. Mentoring is meant to be the space where they can open up about growth and direction.

This is why mentoring works best when it sits outside reporting lines. Psychological safety depends on neutrality and trust.

What effective mentoring actually looks like

Mentoring is frequently assumed to be intuitive or informal, especially when someone is senior. But in practice, that assumption creates uncertainty, frustration and inconsistent outcomes for both mentor and mentee.

“Effective mentoring doesn’t happen by accident. It’s designed.”

Design does not mean bureaucracy. It means clarity.

From what I see across organisations, effective mentoring rests on four practical foundations:

  1. Clear boundaries and role clarity.
  2. A shared mentoring agreement and contracting.
  3. Strong communication skills that build trust and psychological safety.
  4. A relationship that evolves over time, from guidance to challenge.

Let’s break these down in a practical way.

Mentoring Final

1) Boundaries: mentoring works when the relationship is clearly defined

One of the first things I teach is that you cannot do mentoring well until you understand what mentoring is and what it is not. That understanding gives you the confidence to set up clear contracting around the relationship, including how long it will last, what it contains, what it does not contain and how you manage challenges.

This matters because vague mentoring relationships drift. Even skilled professionals struggle when roles and responsibilities are vague. Clarity beats goodwill, every time.

2) Roles and responsibility: mentors support, mentees own

A mentoring relationship should not feel like the mentor is dragging it forward. Shared responsibility must be made explicit.

As a mentor, you don’t chase your mentee for meetings. The mentee’s job is to look at your calendar, send the invites and set up the milestones, not you.

That one habit changes the dynamic immediately. It signals that the mentee owns their development and the mentor supports it.

It also prevents overdependence, which is one of the common challenges that can stall mentoring over time.

3) Communication skills: mentoring is built on listening, questions and feedback

A core focus of the Mentoring for Success Programme is developing the communication capabilities that underpin every successful mentoring interaction. This includes practising active listening, powerful questioning and balanced, constructive feedback.

Active listening sounds simple until you try to do it under pressure. You need to know when to stay quiet and when not to talk.

Effective mentoring is not about expertise alone. It is about helping others think, reflect and grow.

4) Mentoring must evolve over time: from guidance to challenge

A mentoring relationship should change over time. If it does not, development stalls and the relationship loses impact.

In early stages, mentoring may involve more knowledge-sharing. Over time, it should shift toward a more coaching, reflective approach.

The goal of mentoring is development, not dependence.

What organisations often underestimate

If you are implementing mentoring across an organisation, two things make the biggest difference.

Senior endorsement is not optional

Mentoring works best when it is clearly valued and supported at senior level. Leadership should clearly communicate expectations and importance.

One-off training is not enough

Mentoring is a relationship that unfolds over time. Mentors need preparation for real challenges like disengagement and mismatched expectations.

Practical first steps you can take now

  1. Define mentoring clearly. Make sure everyone understands what it is and what it is not.
  2. Keep mentoring outside reporting lines. Protect psychological safety.
  3. Use a mentoring agreement. Clarify expectations and structure.
  4. Build core skills. Focus on listening, questioning and feedback.
  5. Expect evolution. Shift from guidance to challenge.
  6. Support mentors. Provide ongoing support, not just training.

How the Mentoring for Success programme helps

Mentoring for Success is a highly interactive, practice-focused two-day programme designed to equip participants with the mindset, skills and tools needed to become effective workplace mentors.

Participants gain clarity, practise key skills and develop actionable plans they can apply immediately.

  • Understand what mentoring is and how it differs from other roles
  • Establish effective mentoring partnerships
  • Practise key mentoring skills
  • Build trust and handle challenges
  • Develop a structured mentoring approach

The programme is available virtually or face-to-face and can be tailored to organisational needs.

Closing thought: mentoring is a responsibility, not a title

Many professionals are asked to mentor because they are trusted and experienced. What is often missing is clarity.

If you want mentoring relationships that build confidence and independence, treat mentoring as a capability that can be learned and strengthened.

Key Takeaways

Share this Article

Blog Sign up

Sign up to receive the latest industry and company news direct to your inbox.